In re Asbestos Litigation Cases

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 2021
DocketAC 17-0694
StatusUnpublished

This text of In re Asbestos Litigation Cases (In re Asbestos Litigation Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Asbestos Litigation Cases, (Mo. 2021).

Opinion

04/09/2021

Hon. Amy Eddy Case Number: AC 17-0694 Asbestos Claims Court Judge Cascade County Clerk of District Court 415 2nd Avenue North #200, 200A Great Falls, MT 59401 (406) 758-5667

IN THE ASBESTOS CLAIMS COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE ASBESTOS LITIGATION, Cause No. AC 17-0694

Consolidated Cases. ORDER APPROVING CONSOLIDATION AND PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court on the Odegaard Kovacich Snipes, P.C.("OKS") Libby

Mine Claimants'1 and the State of Montana's2 ("State") Joint Motion Approving Consolidation

and Petition for Order Approving Settlement and of Dismissal with Prejudice (hereinafter

"Petition/Dismissal Motion"). A hearing was held before this Court on March 30, 2021 on the

Petition/Dismissal Motion. On the basis of the Petition/Dismissal Motion, the hearing thereon,

and good cause appearing therefor, the Court, having fully considered the same and being thereby

advised in the premises, now enters the following:

1 The OKS Libby Mine Claimants are defined in the Memorandum of Understanding of Settlement Agreement ("OKS/State MOU"), dated January 8, 2021, attached to the Petition/Dismissal Motion as Exhibit A.

2 The State of Montana includes any and all departments, agencies, divisions, and employees of the State of Montana.

ORDER APPROVING CONSOLIDATION AND PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 1 FINDINGS OF FACT

1) Beginning in the late 1960's and increasingly into the 1990's, Zonolite Mining

Company/W.R. Grace (collectively "Grace") employees and former employees and their family

members made claims against Grace for asbestos-related diseases.

2) Many of those claims settled and some cases were tried to verdict.

3) On April 2, 2001, Grace filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.

4) Since the Grace bankruptcy filing, in addition to this matter, the lawsuits identified

on Exhibit B to the Petition/Dismissal Motion have been filed by the OKS Libby Mine Claimants

against the State.

5) In all the lawsuits and claims against the State, the OKS Libby Mine Claimants

allege injury and damages from alleged asbestos-related disease allegedly caused by the State

among other defendants.

6) In December 2020, the OKS Libby Mine Claimants and the State engaged in

mediation in an effort to resolve the OKS Libby Mine Claimants' lawsuits and claims against the

State.

7) Representatives of the State's insurer, National Indemnity Company ("NIC"),

attended the mediation.

8) As a result ofthe mediation, the State and OKS Libby Mine Claimants entered into

the OKS/State MOU attached as Exhibit A to the Petition/Dismissal Motion.

9) The OKS/State MOU sets forth the terms and conditions ofthe settlement between

the OKS Libby Mine Claimants and the State, including identification of settling parties; lawsuits

and claims being settled; amount of settlement; form of releases; and payment of the settlement

ORDER APPROVING CONSOLIDATION AND PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 2 amount into a Qualified Settlement Fund Trust. NIC made no contribution to the OKS/State

Tentative Settlement.

10) Under the OKS/State MOU, upon judicial approval, the OKS Libby Mine

Claimants' lawsuits and claims against the State will be settled for the following consideration:

a. Payment in the amount of$754,000.00, which subject to court approval and

the State not being precluded by court order from depositing the $754,000.00 into the OKS Libby

Mine Claimants Qualified Settlement Fund Trust("OKS Libby Mine Claimant QSF"), will be paid

into the OKS Libby Mine Claimant QSF within thirty calendar days of court approval.

b. A contingent payment of additional funds to the OKS Libby Mine

Claimants which payment is contingent upon the State recovering cash payments from NIC in the

pending action National Indemnity Company v. State ofMontana("NIC v. State"), Montana First

Judicial District Court, Lewis & Clark County, Cause No. XDDV-2012-140, as follows:

I. Should the State be paid by NIC $1,733,900.00 over and above

$25,530,936.19 (the $16,100,000.00 previously paid by NIC into the "Libby Mine Claimants'

Qualified Settlement Fund Trust" approved in Orr v. State, Montana First Judicial District Court,

Lewis & Clark County, Cause No. BDV-2001-423 (hereinafter "Orr QSF") and an additional

$9,430,936.19 in NIC v. State), the State shall pay into the OKS Libby Mine Claimants QSF an

additional $263,900.00.

II. Should the State be paid by NIC less than $1,733,900.00 over and

above the $25,530,936.19 referenced in paragraph 2.b.I. above, the contingent $263,900.00 shall

be reduced by .1522 for each dollar paid to the State by NIC less than $1,733,900.00 over and

above the $25,530,936.19 referenced in paragraph 2.b.I. above. For example, if the State is paid

ORDER APPROVING CONSOLIDATION AND PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 3 by NIC $1,560,510.00 over and above the $25,530,936.19 referenced in paragraph 2.b.I. above,

the contingent $263,900.00 shall be reduced to $237,510.00.

III. Should the State not be paid by NIC any money over and above the

$25,530,936.19 referenced in paragraph 2.b.I. above, there will be no additional payment due the

OKS Libby Mine Claimants over the $754,000.00 set forth in paragraph 2.a. above.

c. Should the State be paid by NIC at least $50,379,621.61, any amount not

already paid under paragraph 2.a. or 2.b. shall be accelerated and paid within thirty (30) days of

the State receiving such funds from NIC, court approval of the OKS/State Tentative Settlement,

and no order precluding the State from depositing such funds into the OKS Libby Mine Claimant

QSF.

d. W.R. Grace PI Trust Indirect Claims: The OKS Libby Mine Claimants'

lawsuits and claims shall be subject to the "State Round 4 MOU Indirect Claims Exemplar"

attached to the OKS/State MOU.

11) The OKS Libby Mine Claimants' counsel have previously established the OKS

Libby Mine Claimant QSF for purposes of receipt and distribution of settlement proceeds. The

OKS Libby Mine Claimants QSF will be subject to the jurisdiction of this Court.

12) Under the OKS/State MOU,the OKS Libby Mine Claimants QSF will be funded

by payments from the State.

13) The OKS/State Tentative Settlement resolves the OKS Libby Mine Claimants'

lawsuits and claims against the State.

14) Copies of releases from the OKS Libby Mine Claimants have been provided to the

Court. The Court has also been advised of the amount of the OKS/State Tentative Settlement to

be received by each OKS Libby Mine Claimant.

ORDER APPROVING CONSOLIDATION AND PETITION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 4 15) Litigation against the State concerning alleged asbestos-related injury and damages

arising out of the State's alleged actions/inactions at the W.R. Grace operations in and near Libby,

Montana, has spanned nearly 21 years. The facts and legal theories involving that litigation are

extraordinarily complex. The OKS Libby Mine Claimants' lawsuits and claims against the State

involve numerous disputed factual questions and unresolved legal questions. Given the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2-9-303
Montana § 2-9-303(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re Asbestos Litigation Cases, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-asbestos-litigation-cases-mont-2021.