In re Asa-Kwapong

Fourth Circuit

In re Asa-Kwapong

619 F. App'x 243

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1780

StatusPublished

This text of 619 F. App'x 243 (In re Asa-Kwapong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Asa-Kwapong, 619 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Asa-Kwapong petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions for discovery. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motions. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Asa-Kwapong’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny as moot the motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Asa-Kwapong petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions for discovery. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motions. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Asa-Kwapong’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny as moot the motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-asa-kwapong-ca4-2015.