In re A.S.

2021 Ohio 1001
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2021·No. CA2020-11-071 CA2020-11-073 CA2020-11-074·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[Cite as In re A.S., 2021-Ohio-1001.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

IN RE: :

A.S., et al. : CASE NOS. CA2020-11-071 CA2020-11-073 : CA2020-11-074

: DECISION 3/29/2021 :

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case Nos. 19-D000053; 19-D000054; 19-D000055

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kathryn Horvath, 520 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for appellee

Eric V. Robinson, P.O. Box 12341, Norwood, Ohio 45212, for appellant

Amie L. Wright, 4555 Lake Forest Drive, Suite 650, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, for Mother

James A. Dearie, 12 East Warren Street, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for Father

Lorraine Search, 6 S. 2nd Street, Suite 309, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for CASA

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, A.G., the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings

and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division,

and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. Warren CA2020-11-071 CA2020-11-073 CA2020-11-074

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., S. POWELL and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re A.S., 2021 Ohio 1001 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).

2021 Ohio 1001 (In re A.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re A.S.
2021 Ohio 1001 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)