in Re Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe
This text of in Re Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe (in Re Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 5, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-09-00920-CV
In Re Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 28, 2009, relators, Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Joseph Halbach, Jr., presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to vacate his August 27, 2009 order granting partial summary judgment on bill of review.
Relators have not established their entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. See In re Moreno, 4 S.W.3d 278 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and their related emergency motion to stay the underlying proceedings.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Arugha Etuwewe and Ubong Etuwewe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arugha-etuwewe-and-ubong-etuwewe-texapp-2009.