in Re Artis Charles Harrell
This text of in Re Artis Charles Harrell (in Re Artis Charles Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 3, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00731-CV ——————————— IN RE ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Artis Charles Harrell, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition
for writ of mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Patricia J.
Kerrigan, abused her discretion by not ruling on pending motions within a
reasonable period of time.1
1 The underlying proceeding is Artis Charles Harrell v. Jerome Godinich, Jr., No. 2014- 63129, in the 190th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Patricia J. Kerrigan presiding. We deny the petition.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Artis Charles Harrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-artis-charles-harrell-texapp-2016.