in Re Arthur Y. Pena
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00225-CV
In re Arthur Y. Pena
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Arthur Y. Pena filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the
trial court had not acted on his motion for DNA testing. See Tex. R. App. P. 52; see also Tex. Code
Crim. Proc. arts. 64.01-.05. Since he filed his petition, the trial court ordered a response from the
State, the State responded in opposition of Pena’s motion, and the trial court denied Pena’s request.
Pena has received an answer to his motion and his petition is thus moot. We deny the petition for
writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
Filed: July 11, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Arthur Y. Pena (in Re Arthur Y. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.