in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed April 16, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00445-CV
IN RE ARTHUR ROY MORRISON, Relator
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F93-58780L
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Fillmore Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for
judgment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not
recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is
entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318,
320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for
writ of mandamus.
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
140445F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison (in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.