in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 16, 2014·No. 05-14-00445-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed April 16, 2014.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00445-CV

IN RE ARTHUR ROY MORRISON, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F93-58780L

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Fillmore Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for

judgment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not

recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is

entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318,

320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

140445F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison (in Re: Arthur Roy Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)