in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 2010·No. 14-10-00508-CR·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 9, 2010

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-10-00508-CR

In Re Arthur J. Woods, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

On June 9, 2010, relator, Arthur J. Woods, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Mary Lou Keel, presiding judge of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his motion for mistrial. 

Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.[1]  Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and related emergency motion to stay proceedings.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Sullivan, and Christopher.

Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 



[1] The mandamus record does not reflect that relator requested the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on his motion for mistrial. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State (in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.