In re Arnstein
101 F. 706, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16
This text of 101 F. 706 (In re Arnstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Arnstein, 101 F. 706, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).
Opinion
The ruling of the referee, excluding the , claims of Emily Smith and Aim Reilly except for rent accrued up to the time of the filing of the petition, is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schlussel v. Emmanuel Roth Co.
637 A.2d 944 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Trust Co. of Chicago v. Fargeson
92 N.E.2d 211 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1950)
First Nat. Bank of Canton v. Irving Trust Co.
66 F.2d 485 (Second Circuit, 1933)
In re Metropolitan Chain Stores, Inc.
2 F. Supp. 287 (S.D. New York, 1932)
Soroka v. Knott
168 N.E. 703 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)
In re Sherwoods, Inc.
210 F. 754 (Second Circuit, 1913)
In re Roth & Appel
181 F. 667 (Second Circuit, 1910)
In re International Milling Co.
175 F. 308 (E.D. New York, 1909)
In re Hinckel Brewing Co.
123 F. 942 (N.D. New York, 1903)
In re Schaefer
104 F. 973 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 F. 706, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arnstein-nysd-1899.