In re Arnstein
101 F. 706, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16
Opinion
The ruling of the referee, excluding the , claims of Emily Smith and Aim Reilly except for rent accrued up to the time of the filing of the petition, is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Arnstein, 101 F. 706, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).
101 F. 706 (In re Arnstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schlussel v. Emmanuel Roth Co.
637 A.2d 944 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Trust Co. of Chicago v. Fargeson
92 N.E.2d 211 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1950)
First Nat. Bank of Canton v. Irving Trust Co.
66 F.2d 485 (Second Circuit, 1933)
In re Metropolitan Chain Stores, Inc.
2 F. Supp. 287 (S.D. New York, 1932)
Soroka v. Knott
168 N.E. 703 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)
In re Sherwoods, Inc.
210 F. 754 (Second Circuit, 1913)
In re Roth & Appel
181 F. 667 (Second Circuit, 1910)
In re International Milling Co.
175 F. 308 (E.D. New York, 1909)
In re Hinckel Brewing Co.
123 F. 942 (N.D. New York, 1903)
In re Schaefer
104 F. 973 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1900)