In re Armstrong
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93
This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93 (In re Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Armstrong, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).
Opinion
In this matter I am not at all satisfied that the service made was a proper service but eliminating that feature, the essential requirement of the written consent of the State Commissioner of Excise, as provided for in subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law is lacking and upon that ground, if no other, the motion is denied with leave to renew.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armstrong-nysupct-1903.