In re Armstrong

76 N.Y.S. 40

This text of 76 N.Y.S. 40 (In re Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Armstrong, 76 N.Y.S. 40 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No appeal lies from an order or decree of this character. A motion in the surrogate’s court should be first made to vacate the order as void for lack of jurisdiction. The appeal is therefore dismissed. The order being without precedent, the dismissal is without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 N.Y.S. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armstrong-nyappdiv-1902.