Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/In Re Armstrong

In Re Armstrong

688 S.E.2d 22, 2009 WL 4884450
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Armstrong. Read the opinion of the Court — 688 S.E.2d 20 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 10, 2009·No. 338P09·Published

Opinion

688 S.E.2d 22 (2009)

In re Arthur O. ARMSTRONG.

No. 338P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 10, 2009.

Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.

Quentin T. Sumner, Senior Resident Judge, for Sumner, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant (Armstrong) on the 18th of August 2009 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Nash County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 10th of December 2009."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant (Armstrong) on the 21st of August 2009 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Nash County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 10th of December 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Armstrong, 688 S.E.2d 22, 2009 WL 4884450 (N.C. 2009).

688 S.E.2d 22 (In Re Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.