In re Armour

927 A.2d 1247, 192 N.J. 218, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1775
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 6, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-178, concluding that FRANK L. ARMOUR of EAST HANOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating RPC 8.4(b)(commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

[219] It is ORDERED that FRANK L. ARMOUR is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Armour, 927 A.2d 1247, 192 N.J. 218, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1775 (N.J. 2006).

927 A.2d 1247 (In re Armour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Neil M. Cohen, an Attorney at Law
100 A.3d 529 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)