In re Armant

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Armant

814 So. 2d 1289, 2002 La. LEXIS 1400, 2002 WL 732090

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 2001-B-3004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Wendell Gerard Armant, and the concurrence therein filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/a/ John L. Weimer

Justice, Supeme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent, Wendell Gerard Armant, and the concurrence therein filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges. Upon remand, the hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 10(a) and 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/a/ John L. Weimer

Justice, Supeme Court of Louisiana

In re Armant, 814 So. 2d 1289, 2002 La. LEXIS 1400, 2002 WL 732090 (La. 2002).

Pincite

814 So. 2d 1289 (In re Armant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related