in Re: Armando Rodriguez
This text of in Re: Armando Rodriguez (in Re: Armando Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-748-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
On December 5, 2005, relator, Armando Rodriguez, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court. Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the Respondent, the Honorable Horacio Peña, Presiding Judge of the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, to issue a finding on relator=s motion for documents and records, and provide relator with copies of all his trial transcripts.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly,
the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex.R.App.P.47.2(b)
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 8th day of December, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Armando Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armando-rodriguez-texapp-2005.