In Re Armando Ramos v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Armando Ramos v. the State of Texas (In Re Armando Ramos v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00376-CV
IN RE Armando RAMOS
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator, Armando Ramos, filed his petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying
record on May 11, 2026. Having considered the petition and the record, this court has determined
that Ramos has not established that he is entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022-CI-18123, styled Armando Ramos v. Mary Pietrazek, pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Vasquez-Hortick presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Armando Ramos v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armando-ramos-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.