in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2008
Docket13-08-00123-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr. (in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-123-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ARMANDO ESCATIOLA, JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On March 6, 2008, relator, Armando Escatiola, Jr., filed a petition for writ of

mandamus with this Court in which he alleges that the District Clerk of Nueces County,

Patsy Perez, failed to provide him a copy of the reporter’s record in trial court cause

number 91-CR-682-H, Court of Appeals cause number 13-92-00064-CR, as required by

this Court in a post-card ruling on January 8, 2007. The Court, having examined and fully

considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown

himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.

2 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armando-escatiola-jr-texapp-2008.