in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr.
This text of in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr. (in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-123-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE ARMANDO ESCATIOLA, JR.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
On March 6, 2008, relator, Armando Escatiola, Jr., filed a petition for writ of
mandamus with this Court in which he alleges that the District Clerk of Nueces County,
Patsy Perez, failed to provide him a copy of the reporter’s record in trial court cause
number 91-CR-682-H, Court of Appeals cause number 13-92-00064-CR, as required by
this Court in a post-card ruling on January 8, 2007. The Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown
himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.
2 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Armando Escatiola, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-armando-escatiola-jr-texapp-2008.