in Re: Armando and Flora Luna D/B/A Aruba Pools & Spa

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: Armando and Flora Luna D/B/A Aruba Pools & Spa

DecidedMarch 27, 2006

Docket13-06-00141-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Armando and Flora Luna D/B/A Aruba Pools & Spa (in Re: Armando and Flora Luna D/B/A Aruba Pools & Spa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: Armando and Flora Luna D/B/A Aruba Pools & Spa, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-141-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______ ___________________________________________________________

IN RE: ARMANDO AND FLORA LUNA D/B/A ARUBA POOLS & SPA

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion^{^[1]}

Relators, Armando and Flora Luna d/b/a Aruba Pools & Spa, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 27, 2006. After the filing of the petition, relators informed this Court that the jury issue raised in the petition has been resolved. The Court, therefore, is of the opinion that relators' petition is now moot. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 27th day of March, 2006.

^{^[1]} See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI