In Re Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice
This text of 2026 Ark. 49 (In Re Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2026 Ark. 49 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME Opinion Delivered: March 5, 2026 COURT COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL PRACTICE
PER CURIAM
The Supreme Court of Arkansas previously created the Arkansas Committee on
Rules of Criminal Procedure, currently known as the Arkansas Committee on Criminal
Practice. See In re Sup. Ct. Comm. on Rules of Pleading, Prac., & Proc. in Crim. Cases, 281
Ark. App’x 506 (1983) (per curiam); see also In re Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 312 Ark.
App’x 612 (1993) (per curiam). By subsequent per curiam order, this Court authorized the
appointment of up to fifteen members to the Committee. See In re Sup. Ct. Comms. & Bds.,
315 Ark. App’x 751 (1993) (per curiam). It has been the Court’s longstanding custom and
practice to appoint circuit judges, prosecuting attorneys, and criminal defense attorneys from across the state to the Committee.1 Historically, a circuit judge has served as Chair of the
Committee.2
Effective immediately, this per curiam shall govern the appointment process for the
Arkansas Committee on Criminal Practice. The Committee shall consist of fifteen
members, as follows:
– Five (5) circuit judges who are currently serving in judicial office;
– Five (5) prosecuting attorneys who are currently serving in that office; and
– Five (5) attorneys who are actively engaged in the practice of criminal defense.
The Chair of the Committee shall be one of the five circuit judges, appointed by this
Court. Members of the Committee shall serve three-year terms and may be reappointed
for one additional consecutive three-year term. See In re Sup. Ct. Comms. & Bds., 315 Ark.
App’x 751 (1993) (per curiam). The Committee’s staggered terms shall expire on January
31 of the applicable calendar year. Id. A member whose term has expired shall continue
to serve until a successor is appointed. Id.
1 See In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2024 Ark. 58 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Crim. Prac. Comm., 2021 Ark. 20 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2020 Ark. 406 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2018 Ark. 132 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2018 Ark. 25 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2017 Ark. 16 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2015 Ark. 128 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2012 Ark. 31 (per curiam). 2 See In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Crim. Prac. Comm., 2021 Ark. 20 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2018 Ark. 25 (per curiam); In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2015 Ark. 128 (per curiam); In re Sup. Ct. Comm. on Crim. Prac., 2009 Ark. 331 (per curiam).
2 A member who ceases to hold the qualifying office or to actively engage in the
qualifying practice shall be deemed to have vacated the position. If a vacancy occurs for
any reason, this Court shall appoint a successor to serve the remainder of the unexpired
term. Service of more than two years of an unexpired term shall constitute a full term for
purposes of the consecutive-term limitation. Service of less than two years of an unexpired
term shall not constitute a full term, and the successor may thereafter serve two full
consecutive three-year terms.
Consistent with this Court’s customs and practices, the Executive Director of the
Arkansas Public Defender Commission and the Prosecutor Coordinator for the Arkansas
Office of Prosecutor Coordinator shall serve as non-voting ex officio advisors to the
Committee. The Administrative Office of the Courts shall continue to assign a staff attorney
to provide administrative support.
Effective immediately, the following individuals are appointed to the Arkansas
Committee on Criminal Practice for an initial term expiring January 31, 2029:
– Carol R. Crews of Conway, Prosecuting Attorney, 20th Judicial District;
– T. Chris Walton of Benton, Prosecuting Attorney, 22nd Judicial District;
– Hon. Hugh A. Finkelstein of Little Rock, Circuit Judge, 6th Judicial District; and
– Hon. Troy B. Braswell, Jr. of Conway, Circuit Judge, 20th Judicial District.
In furtherance of this Court’s intent that its committees maintain staggered terms so
that only one or a limited number of appointments expire in any given year, it is necessary
to assign adjusted initial terms to certain newly appointed members. Accordingly, effective
3 immediately, the following individuals are appointed to the Committee for an initial term
expiring January 31, 2028:
– David L. Ethredge of Mountain Home, Prosecuting Attorney, 14th Judicial District;
– Hon. Melanie H. Martin of Little Rock, Circuit Judge, 6th Judicial District;
– Bobby R. Digby II of Benton, attorney; and
– Zachary W. Morrison of Lake City, attorney.
The Court expresses its appreciation to the newly appointed members for their
willingness to serve on this important Committee. The Court further extends its gratitude
to the following outgoing members, whose terms have expired, for their years of valuable
service: Hon. Keith L. Chrestman of Jonesboro, Michael K. Kaiser of Little Rock, and
Michael S. Robbins of Dover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 Ark. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arkansas-supreme-court-committee-on-criminal-practice-ark-2026.