In re Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-7

2017 Ark. 179
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 11, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 Ark. 179 (In re Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-7) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-7, 2017 Ark. 179 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. 179

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULE 4-7 Opinion Delivered May 11, 2017 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS

PER CURIAM

We hereby amend and republish Rule 4-7 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and

Court of Appeals of the State of Arkansas as set out below. The amendments are effective

immediately. At the end of this order, the changes are set out in “line-in, line-out fashion”

(new material is underlined; deleted material is lined-through).

Rule 4-7. Briefs in Postconviction and Certain Civil Appeals Where Appellant is Incarcerated and Proceeding Pro Se

(a) Applicability. This rule shall govern pro se briefs filed by incarcerated persons in appeals of Rule 37.1 postconviction orders and civil appeals from the denial of relief with regard to petitions for writs of habeas corpus, declaratory judgment, mandamus, and other petitions pertaining to the appellant’s conviction of a criminal offense and/or incarceration. Except for the provisions contained in this rule, briefs filed by pro se parties shall otherwise comply with the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Substantial compliance with this rule shall be sufficient.

(b) Style of briefs.

(1) Briefs - Size - Paper - Type. A pro se brief may be handwritten, typed or produced with computer or word processing equipment. A handwritten brief shall be clearly legible, shall not exceed 30 lines per page and 15 words per line with left-hand and right-hand margins of at least 1½ inches and upper and lower margins of at least 2 inches. Briefs shall be of uniform size on 8½ x 11 inch paper and firmly bound on the left hand margin by staples or other binding devices. Typed briefs shall be double-spaced, except for quoted material, which may be single-spaced and indented. Footnotes, except quotations therein, shall be double-spaced. Use of footnotes is not encouraged, and should be used sparingly. Carbon copies are not Cite as 2017 Ark. 179

acceptable, but copies produced by offset printing, positive photocopy, or other dry photo duplicating process which produces a clearly legible black-on-white reproduction may be used. Each page in the brief should be numbered sequentially with Page 1 being the first page of the argument. The brief need not be signed by the appellant. (2) Length of argument. Unless leave of the Court is first obtained, the argument portion of a brief shall not exceed 30 double-spaced pages including the conclusion, if any. The appellant’s reply brief shall not exceed 15 double-spaced pages and shall not include any supplemental Addendum unless permitted by the Court upon motion. Motions for an expansion of the page limit must set forth the reason or reasons for the request. The motion must specify the number of additional pages requested.

(3) Affidavit. If the pro se appellant received assistance in the preparation of the content of a brief, the brief shall also be accompanied by a notarized affidavit that the appellant has prepared it without the paid assistance of any other prison inmate.

(c) Contents of briefs.

(1) Contents. The contents of the brief shall be in the following order:

(A) Argument. The appellant shall state each issue to be argued and then set out the argument in support of that issue. All citations of decisions of any court must state the name of the case and the volume number and page number where the case may be found.

(B) Addendum. The appellant’s brief shall contain an Addendum, which consists of photocopies of documents from the record. The Addendum shall include true and legible photocopies of at least the original pleading, order from which the appeal is taken, and the notice of appeal. The appellee may prepare a supplemental Addendum if material on which the appellant relies is not in the appellant's Addendum. Only documents that are part of the record lodged in the appeal may be included in the Addendum.

(2) Cover for briefs. On the cover of the brief there should appear the docket number and name of the case, the name of the court from which the appeal is taken, the title of the brief--Brief for Appellant, and the name of the appellant. (3) Insufficiency of appellant’s Addendum. Motions to dismiss the appeal for insufficiency of the appellant’s Addendum will not be recognized. Deficiencies in the appellant’s Addendum will ordinarily come to the Court’s attention and be handled in one of three ways as follows:

2 Cite as 2017 Ark. 179

(A) If the appellee considers the appellant’s Addendum to be defective, the appellee’s brief should call the deficiencies to the Court's attention and may, at the appellee’s option, contain a supplemental Addendum. (B) If the case has not yet been submitted to the Court for decision, an appellant may file a motion to supplement the Addendum and for leave to file a substituted brief. Subject to the Court’s discretion, the Court may grant such a motion and allow the appellant 30 days within which to file the substituted brief. If the appellee has already filed its brief, upon the filing of appellant’s substituted brief, the appellee will be afforded an opportunity to file a substituted brief within 15 days. (C) Whether the appellee has called attention to deficiencies in the Addendum, the Court may address the question at any time. If the Court finds the Addendum to be deficient such that the Court cannot reach the merits of the case, or such as to cause an unreasonable or unjust delay in the disposition of the appeal, the Court will notify the appellant that he or she will be afforded an opportunity to cure any deficiencies, and has 30 days within which to file a substituted brief. Upon the filing of such a substituted brief by the appellant, the appellee will be afforded an opportunity to file a substituted brief within fifteen days. If after the opportunity to cure the deficiencies, the appellant fails to file a complying brief within the prescribed time, the circuit court’s order may be affirmed for noncompliance with the Rule. (4) Non-compliance. Briefs not in substantial compliance with this Rule shall not be accepted for filing by the Clerk. When a party submits a brief on time that does not substantially comply with these Rules, the Clerk shall mark the brief “tendered,” grant the party a 14-day compliance extension, and return the brief to the party for correction. If the party resubmits a compliant brief within fourteen calendar days, then the Clerk shall accept that brief for filing on the date it is received.

(d) Number of briefs and time for filing. (1) Briefs in chief. The appellant shall have 40 days from the date the record is lodged to file eight copies of the brief with the Clerk. (2) Appellee’s brief. The appellee shall have 30 days from the filing of the appellant’s brief to file its brief with the Clerk and serve a copy on the appellant by mail. (3) Reply brief. The appellant shall have 15 days from the date that the appellee’s brief is filed to file eight copies of the reply brief.

(4) Continuances and extensions of time. The Clerk or a deputy clerk may extend the due-date of any brief by 7 calendar days upon oral or letter request. If such an extension is granted, no further extension shall be granted except by the Court upon a written motion showing good cause.

3 Cite as 2017 Ark. 179

Rule 4-7 Briefs in Postconviction and Certain Civil Appeals Where Appellant is Incarcerated and Proceeding Pro Se

(a) Applicability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridgeman v. State
2017 Ark. App. 321 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ark. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ark-sup-ct-r-4-7-ark-2017.