in Re: ARK Contracting Services, LLC
This text of in Re: ARK Contracting Services, LLC (in Re: ARK Contracting Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed June 9, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00351-CV
IN RE ARK CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02192
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Myers, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the
trial court to submit the issue of the amount, reasonableness, and necessity of
attorneys’ fees and expenses to a jury before requiring relator’s payment of the
advancement claim. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the
trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate
remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding)
(citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator
has failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
220351f.p05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: ARK Contracting Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ark-contracting-services-llc-texapp-2022.