In re Arielle K.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Arielle K.

192 A.D.2d 657, 598 N.Y.S.2d 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 657 (In re Arielle K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Arielle K., 192 A.D.2d 657, 598 N.Y.S.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered October 15, 1991, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, made after a hearing, entered July 29, 1991, finding that Arielle K., the [658]*658stepchild of Cecil K., was an abused child, inter alia, placed Arielle K. in the care and custody of the Westchester County Department of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered October 15, 1991, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, made after a hearing, entered July 29, 1991, finding that Arielle K., the [658]*658stepchild of Cecil K., was an abused child, inter alia, placed Arielle K. in the care and custody of the Westchester County Department of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 657, 598 N.Y.S.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arielle-k-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack