In re Argento

E.D. New York

In re Argento

159 F. 498, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110

DecidedJanuary 28, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 159 F. 498 (In re Argento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Argento, 159 F. 498, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110 (E.D.N.Y. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

This applicant voluntarily surrendered his papers in October, 1904. These papers had been obtained in October, 19015, after a residence of five years, and upon a statement that the applicant was less than 18 upon arrival. This statement was untrue.

The applicant seems to have done nothing within five years to reflect upon his moral character, except that he has recently filed a petition in this court, which was verified by him, but did not set forth that he had previously been in possession of a naturalization certificate. His ignorance of English, and the circumstances surrounding the making of his last petition, seem to justify his being allowed to make a new petition setting forth the exact facts. If anything be found inconsistent with good moral character, this can be presented at the time of final hearing; but for the purpose of application his record of good character would seem to he sufficient. See In re Di Clerico, 158 Fed. 905.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

This applicant voluntarily surrendered his papers in October, 1904. These papers had been obtained in October, 19015, after a residence of five years, and upon a statement that the applicant was less than 18 upon arrival. This statement was untrue.

The applicant seems to have done nothing within five years to reflect upon his moral character, except that he has recently filed a petition in this court, which was verified by him, but did not set forth that he had previously been in possession of a naturalization certificate. His ignorance of English, and the circumstances surrounding the making of his last petition, seem to justify his being allowed to make a new petition setting forth the exact facts. If anything be found inconsistent with good moral character, this can be presented at the time of final hearing; but for the purpose of application his record of good character would seem to he sufficient. See In re Di Clerico, 158 Fed. 905.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 F. 498, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-argento-nyed-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack