In Re Arf
Opinion
In the Interest of A.R.F. and D.M.F.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
E. Rex Bradley, Louisiana, MO, for Appellant Patty Johnston.
Malaine P. Hagemeir, Bowling Green, MO, for Appellant Richard Fearn.
Therese Marchlewski, Troy, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Patty Johnston and Richard Fearn appeal the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights. The judgment *606 is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
340 S.W.3d 605 (In Re Arf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.