in Re Arcadio D. Rodgriguez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2009
Docket14-09-00824-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Arcadio D. Rodgriguez (in Re Arcadio D. Rodgriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Arcadio D. Rodgriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 13, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00824-CV

IN RE ARCADIO D. RODRIGUEZ, Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            On September 25, 2009, Relator, Arcadio D. Rodriguez, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.  In his petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Russ Ridgway, judge of the Small Claims Court Harris County Precinct 5, to vacate his orders of October 27, 2008, and July 31, 2009.

            This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code.  Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals.  Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004).  This court does not have jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against a small claims court judge.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004).  Neither does the court have jurisdiction over appeals originally filed in small claims court.  See Sultan v. Mathew, 178 S.W.3d 747, 748 (Tex. 2005).  Therefore, jurisdiction does not lie for enforcement of this court’s jurisdiction.

            Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.


                                                            PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sultan v. Mathew
178 S.W.3d 747 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Arcadio D. Rodgriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arcadio-d-rodgriguez-texapp-2009.