In re Arbitration between Red Line Commercial Co. & Pastene Co.

269 A.D. 632, 58 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3054
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 632 (In re Arbitration between Red Line Commercial Co. & Pastene Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Arbitration between Red Line Commercial Co. & Pastene Co., 269 A.D. 632, 58 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinions

Wasservogel, J.

"While the contract between the parties provided for arbitration of any dispute arising under it, neither the contract nor the rules of the American Spice Trade Association, which were made part of the contract, conferred upon the Supreme Court of the State of New York jurisdiction in personam of the appellant, a Canadian corporation. The appellant did not take part in the arbitration and an award was made against it. Petitioner then moved for an order to confirm the award and for judgment thereon.

Notice of motion to confirm the award was served upon the appellant by mail. The appellant defaulted and an order was made confirming the award and directing entry of judgment against appellant for $1,622.58. The appellant thereupon moved to vacate the judgment and a subpoena duces tecum for the examination of the judgment-debtor-appellant, asserting lack of jurisdiction.

We do not agre,e with the holding by the court at Special Term, that the judgment was entered pursuant to the contract. The appellant did not consent to the jurisdiction of the New York court by consenting to arbitration in New York. Personal jurisdiction must first be obtained before judgment may be entered upon the award. Service by mail was not sufficient (Sargant v. Monroe, 268 App. Div. 123).

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the judgment and the subpoena duces tecum granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Bradford Woolen Corp. & Freedman
189 Misc. 242 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
In re the Arbitration between Gantt & Hurtado & Cia.
189 Misc. 237 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Prosperity Co. v. American Laundry Machinery Co.
271 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
In re the Arbitration between Red Line Commercial Co. & Pastene Co.
270 A.D. 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 632, 58 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arbitration-between-red-line-commercial-co-pastene-co-nyappdiv-1945.