In re Arbitration between Krawchick & Goldman

3 A.D.2d 678, 159 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6606

Opinion

In a proceeding to compel arbitration, [679] the appeals are from so much of an order dater December 3, 1956 which, inter alia, modified the notice of arbitration and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration, and from an order dated December 18, 1956 denying a motion to resettle said order so as to change the dispositive parts thereof. Order dated December 3, 1956 affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dated December 18, 1956 dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Cohen v. Cohen, 286 App. Div. 1035.) But if the appeal were properly here the order would be affirmed. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Arbitration between Krawchick & Goldman, 3 A.D.2d 678, 159 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

3 A.D.2d 678 (In re Arbitration between Krawchick & Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Cohen
286 A.D. 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)