In re Arbitration between Connetquot Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Arbitration between Connetquot Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education

80 A.D.2d 584, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10261

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 584 (In re Arbitration between Connetquot Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Arbitration between Connetquot Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education, 80 A.D.2d 584, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to.confirm an arbitration award, in which respondent cross-applied to vacate the award, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 12, 1979, which denied the petition to confirm and granted the cross application to the extent of vacating the award and directing a hearing before a new arbitrator. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition to confirm the award granted and cross application denied. The arbitrator’s interpretation of the subject contract clause was rational. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to.confirm an arbitration award, in which respondent cross-applied to vacate the award, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 12, 1979, which denied the petition to confirm and granted the cross application to the extent of vacating the award and directing a hearing before a new arbitrator. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition to confirm the award granted and cross application denied. The arbitrator’s interpretation of the subject contract clause was rational. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 584, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arbitration-between-connetquot-teachers-assn-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1981.