In re Arbitration between Arcadu & Peiffer
224 A.D. 855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and award vacated, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that there was evident partiality on the part of Arbitrator Austin in favor of respondents David Levinson and Henry Peiffer. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Arbitration between Arcadu & Peiffer, 224 A.D. 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
224 A.D. 855 (In re Arbitration between Arcadu & Peiffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Smith
243 A.D. 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)