In re Arata

99 So. 3d 29, 2012 WL 4856232
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 12, 2012·No. No. 2012-B-1729·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

| Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the report and recommendation of the hearing committee, and the responses filed by the parties thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for interim suspension be denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall fully and completely adhere to all terms of the recovery agreement he executed with the Lawyers Assistance Program, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Lawyers Assistance Program. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall monitor respondent’s compliance with his recovery agreement and notify this court of any violation, which may be grounds for placing respondent on disability inactive status, or interim suspension, as appropriate.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Marcus R. Clark Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Arata, 99 So. 3d 29, 2012 WL 4856232 (La. 2012).

99 So. 3d 29 (In re Arata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Arata
150 So. 3d 302 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)