In re Arata
This text of 99 So. 3d 29 (In re Arata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
| Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the report and recommendation of the hearing committee, and the responses filed by the parties thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for interim suspension be denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall fully and completely adhere to all terms of the recovery agreement he executed with the Lawyers Assistance Program, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Lawyers Assistance Program. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall monitor respondent’s compliance with his recovery agreement and notify this court of any violation, which may be grounds for placing respondent on disability inactive status, or interim suspension, as appropriate.
FOR THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 So. 3d 29, 2012 WL 4856232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-arata-la-2012.