In re Aranda

Supreme Court

In re Aranda

546 U.S. 810, 126 S. Ct. 250

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 3, 2005

DocketNo. 05-5456

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 546 U.S. 810 (In re Aranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Aranda, 546 U.S. 810, 126 S. Ct. 250 (2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with . Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with . Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 U.S. 810, 126 S. Ct. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aranda-scotus-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack