In Re Application Rerat

35 N.W.2d 291, 227 Minn. 248, 1948 Minn. LEXIS 664
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 24, 1948·No. No. 34,475.·Published

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

This is an application by the petitioner to open the above proceeding to present additional evidence before the Honorable Rol E. Barron, the referee, whose report now before us is based upon evidence introduced at a hearing extending from March 8 to April 1, 1948. After careful consideration of the proposed evidence relative to charges presented to the referee, we conclude that such evidence would not change the findings of the referee, before whom the principal proposed witness’s deposition was read upon the hear *249 ing and who has already indicated that such witness is not entitled to credence. If as suggested by counsel the petitioner has evidence in support of additional charges, the obvious relief as to such charges is to file a petition covering them.

Application denied.

1

Reported in 35 N. W. (2d) 291.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Application Rerat, 35 N.W.2d 291, 227 Minn. 248, 1948 Minn. LEXIS 664 (Mich. 1948).

35 N.W.2d 291 (In Re Application Rerat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.