In Re Application of Wyck

29 N.W.2d 654, 225 Minn. 90
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 21, 1947·No. No. 82,809.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

1 Reported in 29 N.W.2d 654. Application for reinstatement as an attorney at law in this state. Objections to reinstatement were made by the State Board of Law Examiners and the Practice of Law Committee of the State Bar Association. On account of the heinous moral turpitude of the offense of which the applicant was convicted and for which he was disbarred, this court would not be justified in appointing a referee to take testimony in support of or in opposition to the application for reinstatement and would not be justified in reinstating the applicant to the bar of this state.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Application of Wyck, 29 N.W.2d 654, 225 Minn. 90 (Mich. 1947).

29 N.W.2d 654 (In Re Application of Wyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Anderley
696 N.W.2d 380 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2005)
Matter of Kimmel
322 N.W.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
In re the Disciplinary Action against Kimmel
322 N.W.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)