Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Application of Stineman

In re Application of Stineman

556 N.E.2d 184, 52 Ohio St. 3d 88, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 269
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 N.E.2d 184 (In re Application of Stineman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Application of Stineman, 556 N.E.2d 184, 52 Ohio St. 3d 88, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 269 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s application for admission without examination is hereby denied. However, applicant is permitted to reapply for admission. He shall undergo further character and fitness examination and, if approved, be required to take the Ohio bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Earl E. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lail
2011 Ohio 2312 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 N.E.2d 184, 52 Ohio St. 3d 88, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-application-of-stineman-ohio-1990.