In Re Application of Mitchell

Supreme Court of Florida

In Re Application of Mitchell

103 So. 606, 89 Fla. 221, 1925 Fla. LEXIS 817

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 2, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

In Re Application of Mitchell, 103 So. 606, 89 Fla. 221, 1925 Fla. LEXIS 817 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 606 (In Re Application of Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.