In Re Application of Johnson

Montana Supreme Court

In Re Application of Johnson

249 P. 1113, 75 Mont. 610, 1925 Mont. LEXIS 217

Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1925·No. No. 5,859.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The attorneys for petitioner, after the cause .had been argued, filed in this court a statement that the district court of Richland county, in which complainant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, had granted him a new trial; the question submitted for decision having *611 thus become moot, it is ordered that the application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

Mr. Wellington D. Rankin and Mr. L. V. Ketter, for Complainant. Mr. L. A. Foot, Attorney General, for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The attorneys for petitioner, after the cause .had been argued, filed in this court a statement that the district court of Richland county, in which complainant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, had granted him a new trial; the question submitted for decision having *611 thus become moot, it is ordered that the application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

Mr. Wellington D. Rankin and Mr. L. V. Ketter, for Complainant. Mr. L. A. Foot, Attorney General, for the State.

In Re Application of Johnson, 249 P. 1113, 75 Mont. 610, 1925 Mont. LEXIS 217 (Mo. 1925).

Pincite

249 P. 1113 (In Re Application of Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.