In re Application of Holzhauser

660 N.E.2d 473, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2500
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1996
Docket92-1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 473 (In re Application of Holzhauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Application of Holzhauser, 660 N.E.2d 473, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2500 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

On Report by the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness of the Supreme Court, No. 75. On November 20, 1995, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court, recommending that the applicant, Gillian K. Holzhauser, be approved for admission to the practice of law. The applicant filed no objections to the board’s Final Report, and this cause was considered by the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective February 6, 1996, that Gillian K. Holzhauser not be approved and that she may not reapply for admission for two years from the date of this order. It is further ordered that upon reapplieation, the applicant shall undergo further review of her character, fitness, and moral qualifications. It is further ordered that the applicant’s results from the July 1991 Ohio bar examination remain sealed until such time as she is approved as to her character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant the application and unseal immediately Holzhauser’s bar examination results.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Application of Holzhauser-Graber (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4500 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 N.E.2d 473, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-application-of-holzhauser-ohio-1996.