In re Application of Holzhauser

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Application of Holzhauser

605 N.E.2d 388, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 3095

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 1993·No. 92-1917·Published

Opinion

This matter is before this court upon the filing of a report in the office of the Clerk of this court by the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, recommending that the applicant, Gillian R. Holzhauser, not be approved and that she not be permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Upon consideration of the motion of the special investigator for the board, Timothy J. Ucker, for leave to file brief instanter,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for leave to file brief instanter be, and the same is hereby, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter is before this court upon the filing of a report in the office of the Clerk of this court by the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, recommending that the applicant, Gillian R. Holzhauser, not be approved and that she not be permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Upon consideration of the motion of the special investigator for the board, Timothy J. Ucker, for leave to file brief instanter,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for leave to file brief instanter be, and the same is hereby, granted.

In re Application of Holzhauser, 605 N.E.2d 388, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 3095 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

605 N.E.2d 388 (In re Application of Holzhauser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.