In Re Application of Fitzpatrick
This text of 82 A.2d 8 (In Re Application of Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MICHAEL FITZPATRICK FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and Wm. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Rudolph Eisner argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.
Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the State (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hughes, 9 N.J. Super. 511 (Cty. Ct. 1950). We assume that the Parole Board will grant relief from any manifest injustice so far as it is within its power, and if enabling legislation is necessary, that the Executive Department will seek the enactment of such legislation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.2d 8, 14 N.J. Super. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-application-of-fitzpatrick-njsuperctappdiv-1951.