in Re Application of Consumers Energy Co for Rate Increase

Michigan Supreme Court

in Re Application of Consumers Energy Co for Rate Increase

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 6, 2011·No. 142840·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 6, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

142840 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly In re APPLICATION OF CONSUMERS ENERGY Brian K. Zahra, COMPANY FOR RATE INCREASE. Justices _________________________________________/ PHIL FORNER, Appellant, v SC: 142840 COA: 288728 MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PSC: 00-015245 and CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY, INC. Appellees, and CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 6, 2011 _________________________________________ h0829 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 6, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

142840 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly In re APPLICATION OF CONSUMERS ENERGY Brian K. Zahra, COMPANY FOR RATE INCREASE. Justices _________________________________________/ PHIL FORNER, Appellant, v SC: 142840 COA: 288728 MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PSC: 00-015245 and CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY, INC. Appellees, and CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 6, 2011 _________________________________________ h0829 Clerk

in Re Application of Consumers Energy Co for Rate Increase, (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

in Re Application of Consumers Energy Co for Rate Increase (in Re Application of Consumers Energy Co for Rate Increase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.