In re Application for Reinstatement of Ferrigno

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
DocketSCAD-17-0000557
StatusPublished

This text of In re Application for Reinstatement of Ferrigno (In re Application for Reinstatement of Ferrigno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Application for Reinstatement of Ferrigno, (haw 2017).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-17-0000557 21-AUG-2017 02:37 PM

SCAD-17-0000557

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

In re: Application for the Reinstatement of

ROBERT V. FERRIGNO

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(Prior Supreme Court No. SCAD-13-0000423;

Prior ODC Case Nos. 07-125-8585, 10-071-8905)

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the record and the Disciplinary

Board’s Report and Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Robert

V. Ferrigno to the practice of law, we conclude that Applicant

Ferrigno has proven, by clear and convincing evidence,

rehabilitation, fitness to practice law, competence, compliance

with applicable disciplinary orders and rules, and compliance

with all requirements imposed by this court, as required by Rule

2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of

Hawai'i. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant Ferrigno is

reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction.

Applicant Ferrigno, however, shall contact the Hawai'i State Bar

Association prior to his resumption of practice to ensure he is

in compliance with Rule 17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of

the State of Hawai'i governing administrative registration of

licensed attorneys in this jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall restore

Applicant Ferrigno to the roll of attorneys eligible to practice

in the State of Hawai'i.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant Ferrigno shall

bear the costs of these reinstatement proceedings, upon approval

of a timely submitted verified bill of costs from the Office of

Disciplinary Counsel, as authorized by Rule 2.17(d) of the Rules

of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 21, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re Application for Reinstatement of Ferrigno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-application-for-reinstatement-of-ferrigno-haw-2017.