In Re Apple Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Apple Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 581 F. App'x 886
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 5, 2011·No. 2012-M103·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit IN RE APPLE INC., Pet£tioner. Miscel1aneous Docket No. 103 On Petition for Writ of 1Vlandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case nos. 09-CV-0326, 10-CV-O248, and 09-CV-289, Judge Char1es Everingham IV. ON PETITION ORDER App1e Inc. submits a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of TeXas to vacate its June 15, 2011 order deny- ing transfer and to direct transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THATZ

cc: Gregory Steven Arovas, Esq. John Jeffrey Eichmann, Esq. S 2 Simp1eAir, Inc. is directed to respond no later than October 20, 2011. F0R THE CoURT 0 5 /s/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Horbaly C1erk C1erk, United States District Court for the Eastern District Of Texas 19 FlLE U.S. CDURT 0F AF'?PEALS FOR THE'FEDERAL C|RCU1T C-CT'U5 2011 JAN HDRBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Apple Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

In Re Apple Inc. (In Re Apple Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.