In re Appel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Appel

42 A.D.2d 346, 348 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 346 (In re Appel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Appel, 42 A.D.2d 346, 348 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Judicial Department on April 20, 1931. On August 3, 1971, in the Supreme Court of the State of , New York, County of New York, he pleaded guilty of perjury in the second degree, a misdemeanor, to coyer an indictment charging him with knowingly and willfully testifying falsely on two, occasions before a Grand Jury. Despite such plea, for which respondent received a suspended sentence, the Referee permitted him to relitigate the issue of his guilt

after his claim of innocence. : On the record the Referee’s conclusion that respondent failed to" overcome the priina facie evidence of guilt created by his conviction is fully supported by the evidence

[347]*347By Ms own admission, respondent is guilty of either bribery or perjury and should be disbarred. (Matter of Kreindler, 266 App. Div. 503.)

Murphy, J. P., Lane, Steuer, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective November 12,1973.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI