In Re: Appeal of Valicenti Et Ux.

99 Pa. Super. 279, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 30, 1930
DocketAppeal 214
StatusPublished

This text of 99 Pa. Super. 279 (In Re: Appeal of Valicenti Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Appeal of Valicenti Et Ux., 99 Pa. Super. 279, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320 (Pa. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The Supreme Court in Valicenti’s Appeal, 298 Pa. 276, sustained the board of adjustment in rejecting a permit to these appellants and in directing the removal of an unlawful projection built in violation of *281 Article 2 of Ordinance No. 594 of the first class township of Mt. Lebanon, Allegheny County, which provides, “Where a building line is referred to in this ordinance it shall be construed to mean that the outside wall of the structure, including bay windows, sun parlors, sun porches, dormers, second floor projections, and solid entrances shall not be constructed or maintained nearer to the adjacent street or lot line than the building line so referred to.”

The board of adjustment refused to approve new plans submitted by the appellant which provided for closing the opening between the construction in controversy and a front bedroom and eliminating the front window, without correcting the objectionable second floor feature which they were directed to remove.

The appellants term the affronting projection a porch and contend that the proposed change brings the building within the provisions of the ordinance. The character of the construction cannot be disguised by giving it another name, nor do the proposed alterations, leaving unchanged the external physical lines of the second floor, bring the appellants within the decree of the Supreme Court.

The board of adjustment, and the lower court likewise, held that the second floor projection was contrary to the terms and spirit of the ordinance, and with that view we concur.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valicenti's Appeal
148 A. 308 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Pa. Super. 279, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-appeal-of-valicenti-et-ux-pasuperct-1930.