In re Appeal of Foust

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Appeal of Foust

201 N.W.2d 822, 294 Minn. 549, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1460

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 20, 1972

DocketNos. 43523, 43524

StatusPublished

This text of 201 N.W.2d 822 (In re Appeal of Foust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Appeal of Foust, 201 N.W.2d 822, 294 Minn. 549, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1460 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, Winona County, denying áppellants’ post-trial motion for amended findings of fact or a new trial and from a judgment affirming a final order of the Board of County Commissioners, Winona County, attaching the dissolved Common School District No. 2609 to Independent School District No. 861. Appellants contend that the Board of County Commissioners and the State Board of Education acted upon an erroneous theory of law and that the decision of each body was arbitrary, capricious, oppressive, and in unreasonable disregard of the best interests of the children and students of the dissolved district. No substantial issues are raised for appellate review to warrant an extended opinion; so we affirm on the supported findings of the district court and its memorandum applying controlling principles of law dispositive of these issues.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, Winona County, denying áppellants’ post-trial motion for amended findings of fact or a new trial and from a judgment affirming a final order of the Board of County Commissioners, Winona County, attaching the dissolved Common School District No. 2609 to Independent School District No. 861. Appellants contend that the Board of County Commissioners and the State Board of Education acted upon an erroneous theory of law and that the decision of each body was arbitrary, capricious, oppressive, and in unreasonable disregard of the best interests of the children and students of the dissolved district. No substantial issues are raised for appellate review to warrant an extended opinion; so we affirm on the supported findings of the district court and its memorandum applying controlling principles of law dispositive of these issues.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 N.W.2d 822, 294 Minn. 549, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-appeal-of-foust-minn-1972.