In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 13-PDB-058

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 13-PDB-058

128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 6050366, 2013 La. LEXIS 2459

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 15, 2013

DocketNo. 13-OB-2308

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 3d 997 (In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 13-PDB-058) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 13-PDB-058, 128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 6050366, 2013 La. LEXIS 2459 (La. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On the showing made, we are unable to determine whether the disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably in approving the dismissal of the complaint against respondent. Supreme Court

[998]*998Rule XIX, § 30(C). However, given the allegations made by the complainant, we believe the disciplinary board erred in not directing that the matter be investigated further pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(A), particularly as relates to respondent’s obligations under Rules 1.4 and 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to conduct further investigation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(B).

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On the showing made, we are unable to determine whether the disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably in approving the dismissal of the complaint against respondent. Supreme Court

[998]*998Rule XIX, § 30(C). However, given the allegations made by the complainant, we believe the disciplinary board erred in not directing that the matter be investigated further pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(A), particularly as relates to respondent’s obligations under Rules 1.4 and 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to conduct further investigation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(B).

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 6050366, 2013 La. LEXIS 2459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-appeal-of-decision-of-the-disciplinary-board-no-13-pdb-058-la-2013.