In re Appeal of Chartiers Valley School District

450 A.2d 230, 68 Pa. Commw. 592, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1539
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 8, 1982
DocketAppeal, No. 184 Misc. Dkt. No. 3
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 450 A.2d 230 (In re Appeal of Chartiers Valley School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Appeal of Chartiers Valley School District, 450 A.2d 230, 68 Pa. Commw. 592, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1539 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Wiluiams, Je.,

This matter questions the applicability of the appeal period found in the Judicial Code1 to the provisions of the act governing Assessments in Counties of the Second Class, Act of June 21, 1939, P.L. 626, as amended, 72 P.S. §§5452.1-5452.20.

On June 26, 1981, the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County (Board) rendered a decision reducing the assessment on certain real estate owned by Development Dimensions International (DDI). Some forty-eight days later, on August 13, 1981, the taxing authority, Char-[594]*594tiers Valley School District, entered an appeal of that determination to the common pleas court. DDI filed preliminary objections to the appeal, with a concomitant Motion to Quash, asserting that in compliance with Section 5571(b) of the Judicial Code,2 the appeal should have been filed within thirty days after the Board’s decision, and was therefore untimely.

The common pleas court denied the motion based on the content of 72 P.S. §5452.12,3 which provides for a sixty day appeal period. That order was later amended to include the certification of a controlling issue of law necessary for an interlocutory appeal.

The case sub judice involves substantially the same issue as is raised in Crown v. Ross Township, 68 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 588, 449 A.2d 878 (1982).4 Our analysis therein, that the provisions of the Judicial Code control, governs here. We stated in Grown that the Judicial Code constitutes “an effort to create a uniform system covering appeals, and should be construed to repeal conflicting provisions,” particularly of those acts to which some reference is made in Section 2 of the Judiciary Act Bepealer Act, 42 Pa. C. S. [595]*595§20002(g).5 Cf. Borough of West Homestead v. Mesta Machine Co., 68 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 595, 449 A.2d 876 (1982).

Order

And Now, this 8th day of September, 1982, the Order of .the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, dated February 24, 1981, is hereby reversed, and the Motion to Quash filed by Development Dimensions International is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Foraker
503 A.2d 1024 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Doe-Spun, Inc. v. Morgan
502 A.2d 287 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
In re Appeal of Federated Department Stores, Inc.
467 A.2d 908 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Crown v. Township of Ross
462 A.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Appeal of Chartiers Valley School Dist.
462 A.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Borough of West Homestead v. Mesta Machine Co.
449 A.2d 876 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 A.2d 230, 68 Pa. Commw. 592, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-appeal-of-chartiers-valley-school-district-pacommwct-1982.