In Re App. for Dis., Theodor Herzl Herman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re App. for Dis., Theodor Herzl Herman

125 N.W.2d 169, 267 Minn. 547, 1963 Minn. LEXIS 795

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 6, 1963

DocketNo. 39,200

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 N.W.2d 169 (In Re App. for Dis., Theodor Herzl Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re App. for Dis., Theodor Herzl Herman, 125 N.W.2d 169, 267 Minn. 547, 1963 Minn. LEXIS 795 (Mich. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners for the disbarment of Theodor Herzl Herman, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota, by service of its petition and the order of this court requiring respondent to answer the same within 20 days after the date of such service, August 22, 1963. No answer or other pleading to said petition or order has been filed, and respondent is now in default.

The petition of the State Board of Law Examiners alleges that respondent was, on June 17, 1963, found guilty by the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of th'e State of Minnesota of a felony, as evidenced by a certified copy of a judgment and commitment attached to said petition.

IT Is Therefore Ordered, That respondent, Theodor Herzl Herman, be and he hereby is disbarred and that his name be stricken from the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners for the disbarment of Theodor Herzl Herman, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota, by service of its petition and the order of this court requiring respondent to answer the same within 20 days after the date of such service, August 22, 1963. No answer or other pleading to said petition or order has been filed, and respondent is now in default.

The petition of the State Board of Law Examiners alleges that respondent was, on June 17, 1963, found guilty by the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of th'e State of Minnesota of a felony, as evidenced by a certified copy of a judgment and commitment attached to said petition.

IT Is Therefore Ordered, That respondent, Theodor Herzl Herman, be and he hereby is disbarred and that his name be stricken from the

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 N.W.2d 169, 267 Minn. 547, 1963 Minn. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-app-for-dis-theodor-herzl-herman-minn-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack