In re A.P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re A.P.

895 A.2d 519

DecidedMarch 15, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 895 A.2d 519 (In re A.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re A.P., 895 A.2d 519 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW", this 15th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, hmited to the following issues:

Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner was not an aggrieved party under Pa.R.A.P. 501 and, consequently, holding that petitioner had no standing to challenge his delinquency adjudication because his disposition was discontinued?

“Whether an adjudication of delinquency followed by a dispositional order to discontinue the petition is a final order from which a juvenile may appeal?

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW", this 15th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, hmited to the following issues:

Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner was not an aggrieved party under Pa.R.A.P. 501 and, consequently, holding that petitioner had no standing to challenge his delinquency adjudication because his disposition was discontinued?

“Whether an adjudication of delinquency followed by a dispositional order to discontinue the petition is a final order from which a juvenile may appeal?

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 A.2d 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ap-pa-2006.