In re Antwine
This text of 98 So. 3d 797 (In re Antwine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to return an unearned fee and failed to properly withdraw from the representation of a client. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Jarvis M. Antwine, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22922, be publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent attend and successfully complete the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall make restitution to Anthony Green of the sum of $2,500.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 So. 3d 797, 2012 WL 4475688, 2012 La. LEXIS 2493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antwine-la-2012.